MOON TREATY
The Moon Treaty is the only one of the four documents drafted by COPUOS
not yet in force; the Secretary General has not yet received deposition
of the instruments of ratification by five nations, as required by the
treaty itself. The Moon Treaty also represents the only one of the four
agreements which became deeply imbedded in controversy immediately upon
its resolution of approval by the General Assembly. Some of the more controversial
provisions include:
- a ban on all weapons (not just nuclear or mass destruction weapons)
from celestial bodies, although this provision is not applied to Earth
orbit;
- a clear prohibition on private ownership of extraterrestrial real
estate, or of resources "in place," and a designation of extraterrestrial
resources as the Common Heritage of Mankind; and
- the eventual establishment of an Outer Space Regime whose authority
would be actionable and whose purpose would be to oversee and regulate
the "orderly development and exploitation" of extraterrestrial
resources.
The Treaty was codified in 1979. Its basic purpose was to insure that
any wealth obtained from the Moon by any space faring nation was to be
distributed to all the people of the world. This treaty was the culmination
of the time when the world's underdeveloped nations were attempting to
use international forums to assert their rights as sovereign nations and
to obtain their share of the world's and space's resources.
In the Moon Treaty is a phrase which states that the Moon is the "common
heritage of all mankind." The Outer Space Treaty had words which
sounded similar - "the common Province of all mankind", but
actually meant that no single country could claim outer space or other
celestial bodies as colonies, but it permits the use of the resources.
"The common heritage of all mankind" is a phrase which means
all the resources of space belong to all nations and the use or extraction
by one nation is against this treaty. There is also an international organization
established to redistribute the wealth returned from the moon and Outer
Space. This interpretation of the treaty is disputed and has resulted
in the U.S. and Soviet Union/Russia not signing the treaty.
The Moon Treaty has only be ratified by nine countries since its codification
in 1979. Neither the U.S. nor Russia have signed it. This treaty brought
the international cooperation period to a close. Mistrust of the Northern
nations by the Southern nations has become more apparent and there has
been less desire to cooperate. Future treaties for the use of outer space
may be in doubt even if they are desperately needed.
Despite the accession of the American delegation to the Moon Treaty and
despite the delegation's uncontradicted statement in COPUOS that the words
"in place" allow private property rights to apply to resources
upon extraction it now appears doubtful that the Moon Treaty will be presented
to the U.S. Senate for ratification in the near future (15). Private interests
in the United States fear that the Outer Space Regime (or space government)
will tend more toward a one-nation-one-vote structure than toward the
contribution-oriented organization of the World Bank or International
Monetary Fund. Many analysts fear that the majority of countries might
insist, as they have in the Seabed Treaty negotiations, that this proposed
space administration not simply issue licenses without discrimination
(perhaps for a nominal fee or small net profit percentage), but also deny
or control uses of outer space, levy stiff taxes, and/or oversee equipment
use and retrieval in free space.
[BACK TO ICE ON THE MOON]
|